When You Bare, Take Care

Sunscreens faulted on cancer protection

By LINDA A. JOHNSON,
Associated Press Writer
Fri Jun 16, 2:31 AM ET


Think slathering on the highest-number sunscreen at the beach or pool
will spare you skin cancer and premature wrinkles? Probably not, if
you're in the sun a lot. That's because you don't need a sunburn to
suffer the effects that can cause various types of skin cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sunscreens generally do a good job filtering out the ultraviolet rays
that cause sunburn ? UVB rays. But with sunburn protection, many
people get a false sense of security that keeps them under the harsh
sun much longer. That adds to the risk of eventual skin cancer ? both
deadly melanoma and the more common and less-threatening basal and
squamous cell cancers.

And most sunscreens don't defend nearly as well against the UVA rays
that penetrate deep into the skin and are more likely to cause skin
cancer and wrinkles. That's true even for some products labeled
"broad-spectrum UVA/UVB protection."

Experts say the best protection against UVA is a sunscreen that
includes zinc oxide, titanium dioxide or avobenzone. Consumers should
also look for those that are water-resistant and have an SPF of 30 or
better, indicating strong protection against UVB rays, and apply
liberally and often.

More important, limit time in the sun, particularly from 10 a.m. to 4
p.m., and cover up, including wearing a hat and sunglasses.

Often, product labels are confusing or bear misleading claims. For
example, the SPF, or sun protection factor, refers only to defense
against the less harmful UVB rays.

"I don't think people understand they're only getting protection from
part of the spectrum," said Dr. Sandra Read, a spokeswoman for the
American Academy of Dermatology. "You're accumulating this damage and
you don't know it."

Many sunscreens say little about when to reapply ? doctors say at
least every two hours and after swimming or sweating. Nor do they say
much about how much to use, roughly two tablespoons for an adult.

"Most people who use an SPF 15 get the protection equivalent to an SPF
5 because they put it on" too thinly, said Dr. Martin A. Weinstock,
chairman of the American Cancer Society's skin cancer advisory
group and a Brown University professor.

While a higher SPF number means more protection, the difference is
small: SPF 15 blocks about 93 percent of UVB rays and SPF 50, often
more expensive, blocks about 98 percent.

Most sunscreens work by reacting chemically with the skin, so they
don't start absorbing damaging rays right away and must be applied a
half-hour before going outside, something many labels fail to note.

And claims such as "waterproof" and "sunblock" are unsupported,
according to the Food and Drug Administration, which years ago
proposed replacing them with the more-accurate terms "water resistant"
and "sunscreen." Manufacturers, including Neutrogena Suncare maker
Johnson & Johnson and Coppertone maker Schering-Plough Corp., say they
haven't complied because the FDA still hasn't imposed those rules ? a
delay that's spawned consumer lawsuits and pressure on the FDA from
Congress and the American Cancer Society.

Still, doctors say people shouldn't abandon sunscreen: They probably
should use more.

"Sunscreens do protect against skin cancer," said Dr. Babar Rao, a
dermatologist at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Jersey. "We
definitely still need sunscreen, even on a cloudy day."

Research has shown heavy sunscreen use lowers risk of squamous skin
cell cancer, which has a high cure rate if caught early. Another study
found heavy sunscreen use in children reduces the number of moles,
which can turn cancerous later, Weinstock noted.

In 1999, the FDA announced tougher rules for sunscreen testing and
label and ad claims, to take effect in 2001. But the agency put them
on hold indefinitely to do more tests, said Dr. Matthew Holman, senior
scientist at the FDA's drug evaluation center.

Last fall, Congress ordered the FDA to produce the new regulations
within six months through a provision added by Sen. Chris Dodd,
D-Conn., in the FDA appropriations bill.

"Twenty years is long enough for the FDA to ensure that all Americans
have equal access to clear, accurate and comprehensive sunscreen
labeling as their first line of defense against skin cancer," Dodd
said, referring to how long the agency has worked on new rules.

Holman said proposed rules could be announced this summer, but then
there will be lengthy hearings and revisions. "All we can say is
really years" until they take effect, he said.

This spring, a San Diego-based law firm got pending lawsuits against
makers of the top sunscreens ? Coppertone, Neutrogena, Playtex
Products' Banana Boat, Tanning Research Laboratories' Hawaiian Tropic
and Chattem Inc.'s Bullfrog ? consolidated into one case in Los Angeles.

Lead lawyer Samuel Rudman, who has called the makers "Fortune 500
snake oil salesmen," said manufacturers are fraudulent in their label
claims.

"Our lawsuit doesn't say, 'Don't use sunscreen.' It says, 'Tell the
truth.' If people knew, they would still use it," Rudman said.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of 10 California residents, also seeks
damages for unspecified injuries and other restitution.

The manufacturers either declined to discuss the lawsuit or said it is
without merit.

Despite public education campaigns about avoiding sun exposure and
tanning salons, skin cancer incidence is climbing. There will be about
62,000 melanoma cases and 7,900 deaths this year, the American Cancer
Society estimates. There are more than 1 million annual cases of
squamous and basal skin cancers, and about 2,800 deaths.